Excellent, patronising and predictable were exactly what I was after.... your posts in a topic that came to a close 16 years ago make people question a 16yo having that level of argument. You cannot blame people for reacting like that.
Your vehement disagreement comes from an ideology of "Rightness" that the younger generation seem to have adapted in our lefty, softy, softy PC world. The real world is a harsh nasty place, if you want to debate with adults with years of real life behind them, you need to accept you won't get polite all the time. Ideology is a great thing, so great that Alex Salmond gave the vote to 16/17 year olds, a group of people who don't know what they want from MacDonalds half the time, he relied on that to carry the day, unfortunately there's no such thing as an ideal world.
Maybe my background, training and knowledge impacts on my views, difficult if it didn't but that training, education life experiences and knowledge are what I am. I'm not about to apologise for it. I know you've had disagreements with others and as I said, if you want to play in the big world you are in for some disappointments. Maybe if your dad has opinions then this would be the place for him to post, tell him to come online here and debate, I would value insight from his perspective.
Your choice Kvali, however in reatreating, citing the reasons you do, makes you equally "as bad" as my not wanting to comment, but that'll probably be be okay from your perspective.
AG, please accept my apologies for the hijacking of your thread, it was not my intention to drop into a personal debate of any sort. Like many incidents/accidents/atrocities throughout history, innocence always suffers.